Recovering nutrients and unblocking the cake layer of an electrochemical anaerobic membrane bioreactor | Nature Communications

Nature Communications volume 15, Article number: 9111 (2024) Cite this article

324 Accesses

1 Altmetric

Metrics details

The sustainable development strategy shifts water treatment from pollution removal to resource recovery. Here, an electrochemical resource-recovery anaerobic membrane bioreactor (eRAnMBR) that employed a magnesium plate and conductive membrane as dual anodes is presented and shows excellent performance in carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus recovery, as well as 95% membrane anti-fouling. The Mg2+ released alters the physicochemical properties of sludge, unblocking the cake layer, and recovers ammonium and phosphate, yielding 60.64% purity and 0.08 g d−1 struvite deposited onto cathode to be separated from sludge. The enhanced direct interspecies electron transfer, along with hydrogen evolution and alkalinity increase due to the electrochemical reactions, significantly increase methane yield and purity (93.97%) of the eRAnMBR. This increased internal energy can cover the additional electricity and electrode consumption. This integrated eRAnMBR reactor boasts the benefits of short process, low maintenance, and low carbon footprint, introducing a concept for the next generation of wastewater treatment.

In the context of sustainable development, sewage treatment facilities are not only required to recover renewable resources but also achieve carbon emission reduction. Anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs), which integrate anaerobic processes with membrane separation, are among the most effective low-carbon wastewater treatment technologies, offering excellent application prospects in sustainable water treatment. However, challenges such as membrane fouling1,2 and the inability to recover nitrogen and phosphorus3,4 significantly restrict the large-scale application of AnMBRs in wastewater treatment5. Addressing these issues could greatly enhance their efficiency and application scope6. Besides, biogas produced by anaerobic digestion processes plays a key role in the emerging market for renewable energy7. However, in addition to 60–70% methane (CH4), raw biogas contains 30–40% carbon dioxide (CO2) which decreases its specific calorific value8. Therefore, the ratio of CH4 to CO2 needs to be increased for biogas to work as an effective fuel source9.

Numerous methods have been employed to resist the membrane fouling10. Recently, an approach that incorporates an electric field in AnMBRs has garnered considerable attention as a chemical-free and efficient way to alleviate in-situ membrane pollution11,12. The electrostatic repulsion at the cathode effectively inhibited the deposition of negatively charged extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and soluble microbial products (SMP), which are the main substances contributing to membrane fouling. Most studies have focused on the electrophoresis, electrostatic forces, and other electrodynamic effects of the electric field on the membrane fouling11,12,13, while research on the mechanisms of the regulation of the cake layer in AnMBRs is relatively scarce. However, altering the physicochemical properties of the sludge can directly influence the substances that form membrane fouling, thus modifying the structure of the cake layer or slowing its formation.

As for nitrogen and phosphorus removal, struvite precipitation is considered an excellent method, with recovered struvite further serving as a slow-release fertilizer14. Among the various struvite precipitation methods, electrochemical processes are considered promising due to their high efficiency in nitrogen and phosphorus removal15,16, coupled with the advantages of simple operation, controllable reactions, and reduced sludge production17,18. Typically, struvite precipitation is used as a post-treatment process following biological treatment15,16, and its application within the bioreactor is rare which faces the problem of the separation of struvite and sludge. If magnesium (Mg) anode was introduced into the AnMBR system, it could exert dual effects of the nitrogen and phosphorus removal and electrochemical regulation on membrane fouling. Additionally, the Mg2+ ions and hydroxide ions (OH−) produced from the hydrogen evolution reaction at the cathode can absorb CO2 produced by anaerobic digestion, synergizing CO2 mineralization and biogas upgrading19. Understanding how the Mg anode impacts the biological system during this process is a key area that warrants further investigation.

In this study, an electrochemical resource-recovery AnMBR (eRAnMBR) equipped with double anodes, consisting of an Mg plate and conductive membrane-anode, was developed to facilitate nutrient and energy recovery, as well as alleviate membrane fouling by unblocking the cake layer. Over a 200-day operational period, the eRAnMBR enhanced the recovery of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus and improved membrane filtration capacity. The introduction of the Mg anode improved struvite generation and enhanced the absorption of CO2 from the biogas into the sludge-water mixture, while also altering the structure of the cake layer and inhibiting the formation of the gel layer. The introduction of the electric field enhanced the microbial anodic oxidation and accelerated the transformation of proteins within the system. Changes in the archaea community and the increased capacity for direct interspecies electron transfer (DIET) within the system were also the reason for the promotion of CH4 production. This study presents a strategy for resource and energy recovery from sewage, demonstrating considerable potential for efficient and eco-friendly wastewater treatment.

The eRAnMBR configuration and processes at the anodes and cathode are detailed in Fig. 1a. Initially, the variations in chemical oxygen demand (COD) an CH4 across the three AnMBRs were measured to assess carbon recovery. As shown in Fig. 1b, during the 200 days of operation, the COD concentration gradually decreased and stabilized, with all three reactors demonstrating excellent degradation of organic contaminants, achieving a COD removal rate of 95%. In the first 40 days, the COD degradation rate increased rapidly, but between days 40 and 70, the rate of improvement hardly increased. Therefore, the hydraulic retention time (HRT) was extended from 6 days to 8 days to enhance acclimation efficiency at day 70. After this adjustment, a faster increase in the COD degradation rate of the sludge in the eRAnMBR was observed. This is because, compared to the AnMBR and the eAnMBR, the electrode reactions in the eRAnMBR were more intense (It was concluded from the pH data in Supplementary Fig. 2b and the current data in Supplementary Figs. 3, 4). The alkalinity produced by the cathodic hydrogen evolution reaction could prevent acid inhibition of the system in the initial stages of the anaerobic process (Supplementary Fig. 5), allowing it to complete the four stages of anaerobic process earlier20. From Fig. 1c, the eRAnMBR also exhibited superior carbon recovery performance, with CH4 production rate reaching approximately 790.9 mL d−1, higher than the other two groups, which produced about 692.8 mL d−1. Furthermore, in the eRAnMBR, the proportion of CO2 in the biogas decreased from 27.18% to 1.63%, and the proportion of CH4 in the biogas increased from 67.82% to 93.97%, which was considerably higher than that of previously published reports of AnMBRs10,21,22. This improvement aided the upgrade to biomethane which can be recovered as natural gas with less treatment9,23. This enhancement in CH4 production efficiency was likely due to the significant release of Mg2+ by the Mg anode and increase in alkalinity, which improved the solubility of CO2 in the liquid phase7 and its absorption from the biogas. This is evidenced by the significant increase in bicarbonate ion (HCO3−) concentration observed following the addition of the Mg plate (Supplementary Fig. 6), accelerating CO2 transfer in the liquid phase and facilitating its utilization by methanogens for CH4 production19. Additionally, the hydrogen (H2) produced was utilized by hydrogenotrophic methanogens, in conjunction with CO2 for CH4 production24.

a Mechanisms of the eRAnMBR for struvite recovery and membrane antifouling. b Variations in COD in the three reactors of AnMBRs during the operation period. c Biogas production rate and biogas composition in the three reactors of AnMBRs during the stable operation period, the percentages of each gas have been rounded to the nearest whole number in the figure (The figure primarily highlights the production rates of the main components of biogas, CH4 and CO2. In addition to these two, other gases in biogas we measured were provided in Supplementary Fig. 7). Error bars represent the standard deviation of the biogas production measured 9–12 times during the stable operation phase of each reactor. The anodes of the eAnMBR comprised a conductive membrane and a graphite plate, while the anodes of the eRAnMBR included a conductive membrane and a Mg plate. Applied voltage of both the eRAnMBR and eAnMBR was 0.6 V. COD concentration in the influent was 6 g L−1. (Note: the word electro-AnMBR means we mention both the eRAnMBR and eAnMBR). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

The eRAnMBR also demonstrated considerable nitrogen and phosphorus resource recovery. As shown in Fig. 2a, ammonium (NH4+-N) and phosphate (PO43−-P) significantly decreased in the eRAnMBR, with removal rates of 30.59% and 99%, respectively, compared to minimal recovery in the controlled AnMBR and the eAnMBR. In addition to the sacrificial anode reaction induced by a 0.6 V bias applied to the Mg anode, the Mg anode and graphite cathode also formed a galvanic cell when a 0.6 V bias was applied to the membrane anode, leading to the continuous release of Mg²⁺ (Supplementary Fig. 4). Additionally, in the presence of microorganisms, non-Faradaic current was generated, which further accelerated the corrosion of Mg (Supplementary Fig. 8 and Supplementary Fig. 9). These processes ensured that sufficient Mg²⁺ was available to meet the requirements for struvite formation, resulting in a phosphate removal rate of 99% through the precipitation of magnesium phosphate and struvite. The removed nitrogen and phosphorus were recovered as struvite, which partially precipitated on the cathode surface and was separated from the sludge. When the current between the Mg anode and the graphite cathode dropped below 0.1 A (referred to the current when the 0.6 V applied on the Mg plate, current data was displayed in Supplementary Fig. 4), both the Mg anode and graphite cathode were replaced, which prevented the deposits on the electrodes from affecting mass transfer and electron exchange as well as ensured sufficient Mg2+ throughout the experiment. The images of Scanning electron microscope (SEM) revealed that the cathode plate surface was covered with crystals displaying the needle-shaped prismatic morphology typical of struvite (Supplementary Fig. 10a). The X-ray Diffraction (XRD) results (Fig. 2b) indicated that the precipitates formed on the cathode surface displayed peaks similar to those of struvite, indicating its generation and deposition on the cathode. This process was facilitated by the release of Mg2+ from the sacrificial Mg anode during electrolysis, and hydrogen evolution on the graphite cathode surface, which increased localized pH25,26 and promoted struvite formation. The Mg2+ ions generated at the anode then migrated towards the cathode, driven by the electric field force, thus promoting struvite precipitation on the cathode surface27 (Fig. 1a). Calculating through the method of determination of the struvite on the cathode surface, the purity of struvite was approximately 60.64% and the mass was 0.08 g d−1, which meant approximately 9.04% struvite generated in the reactor was deposited on the graphite cathode surface (Supplementary Fig. 11).

a Variations in NH4+-N and PO43--P of the three AnMBRs. The anodes of the eAnMBR comprised a conductive membrane and a graphite plate, while the anodes of the eRAnMBR included a conductive membrane and a Mg plate. Applied voltage of both the eRAnMBR and eAnMBR was 0.6 V. (Note: the word electro-AnMBR means we mention both the eRAnMBR and eAnMBR). NH4+-N and PO43--P concentrations in influent were 300 mg L−1 and 160 mg L−1, respectively. b X-ray Diffraction spectra of precipitates deposited on the cathode. c Mass and purity of struvite deposited on the cathode plate during the stable period, and the elements (total numbers, mean, standard deviation, minimum, median, maximum) of this box-plot were showed in the form of a table below the figure. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Membrane fouling was also significantly alleviated in the eRAnMBR. As illustrated in Fig. 3a, under identical effluent flux conditions, the transmembrane pressure (TMP) of the AnMBR reached approximately 80 kPa, while the TMP of the eAnMBR and the eRAnMBR were approximately 64 kPa and 4 kPa, respectively. Membrane fouling was reduced by 95% in the eRAnMBR, substantially extending the life span of the membrane, indicating the key role on membrane fouling mitigation of Mg anode.

a Antifouling performance of the three reactors. When TMP of one group reached 80 kPa, the membrane module of all the three reactors were renewed together and the next phase of the operation began. b, c Adhesion force measurements by AFM between metal surface and sludge flocs of the eAnMBR and the eRAnMBR. d Particle size distribution of sludge in the three reactors. e XPS spectra of sludge in the eRAnMBR. f BET surface area, pore volume, porosity, and roughness across three reactors. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

First, the presence of Mg2+ decreased the viscosity of the sludge (Supplementary Fig. 12b), potentially weakening the adsorption force between the membrane surface and sludge flocs, as highly viscous sludge flocs tend to accumulate on the membrane surface28. This effect was confirmed by the images of Atomic force microscopy (AFM)29, which showed a decrease in adhesion force from 13.15 nN to 4.94 nN, thereby slowing the formation of the cake layer30. Second, the size of the sludge flocs increased in the eRAnMBR (Fig. 3d), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis confirmed the existence of Mg(OH)2 (Fig. 3e, Supplementary Note 2 and Supplementary Fig. 18). Mg hydroxide coagulation primarily occurred through charge neutralization and adsorptive mechanisms, leading to floc formation31. The decrease in absolute zeta potential of sludge (Supplementary Fig. 12a) in the eRAnMBR further confirmed the effect of Mg2+ on sludge floc agglomeration. Third, Mg2+ changed the secondary structure of EPS protein weakened the formation of gel layer. As a typical negatively charged and sticky substance4, the contribution of proteins to membrane fouling in the AnMBRs was more than that of polysaccharides in EPS. In comparison to the AnMBR and the eAnMBR, EPS proteins of the eRAnMBR exhibited fewer α-helices and more β-sheets, contributing to the high aggregation capability of the sludge32,33 (Supplementary Fig. 13). A lower α-helix/ (β-sheet + random coil) ratio also suggested that the proteins in the eRAnMBR possessed less hydrogen bonds34,35,36 which played a key role in the gel layer37,38, thus weakening the formation of a compact foulants layer.

Consequently, the eRAnMBR cake layer exhibited a larger BET specific surface area and total pore volume, with porosity reaching 7.47% which was 10 times higher than that of the control group (Fig. 3f). The released Mg2+ improved the physicochemical properties of sludge flocs making which difficult to deposit or adhere to the membrane surface, thus forming a loose porous cake layer structure, which greatly improved the service life of the membrane.

To investigate the mitigation mechanisms of membrane fouling following the application of anodic potential to the membrane, fouling distribution of the cake layer and electrochemical performance were further explored. The Confocal laser-scanning microscopy (CLSM) images showed that while protein intensity was very high in the AnMBR, it significantly decreased after the application of anodic potential imposed on the membrane (Fig. 4c). In contrast, total cell intensity increased from 8.90% to 19.04% following the imposition of anodic potential on the membrane, indicating the formation of electro-biofilm. The images also revealed that proteins in the AnMBR tightly and thickly covered the membrane surface, whereas proteins in the membrane-anode showed a much looser structure, facilitating water permeation. Consequently, the roughness of the cake layer increased after the anodic potential was applied on the membrane (Supplementary Fig. 14a–c).

a Membrane fouling mitigation of the eRAnMBR: effects of anode potential on the cake layer and Mg2+ released on sludge. b Cyclic voltametric analyses of control membrane and electro-membrane in the 0.8 to −0.8 V range at scan rates of 2 mV s−1 using a three-electrode system, with Ag/AgCl (R0303, 6 mm × 65 mm) as the reference electrode, conductive membrane as the working electrode, and graphite cathode as the opposing electrode. Control membrane was the membrane of the AnMBR, and electro-membrane was the membrane of the eAnMBR. c CLSM images of membrane surface of three reactors (total cells are in red, proteins are in green, α-polysaccharides are in purple, and β-polysaccharides are in blue). The percentage represented the ratio of the fluorescence intensity of each substance to the total fluorescence intensity. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

The mechanisms behind the aforementioned results were further investigated. The cyclic voltammogram (CV) curves in Fig. 4b showed that the sludge cake layer on the membrane-anode exhibited markedly higher electron-storage capacity and peak oxidation current compared to the control membrane, indicating the enhancement of microbial anodic oxidation. And the cytochrome c-type coding genes associated with bioelectrochemical oxidation39 of microorganisms on the membrane surface also increased by 14%, from 299 on the control membrane of AnMBR to 341 on the electro-membrane of the eAnMBR (Supplementary Table 1), especially the ccm proteins involved in post-translational modifications essential for Mtr pathway protein production40. Therefore, the current density between the anode and cathode increased driven by exoelectrogens (Supplementary Fig. 3a)41. These results confirmed that microbial anodic oxidation was strengthened after the imposition of anodic potential on the membrane, conductive to the degradation of proteins in the cake layer of the membrane-anode42,43. Given the higher contribution of proteins to membrane fouling in AnMBRs than polysaccharides4, the degradation of proteins was more beneficial for the mitigation of membrane fouling.

Moreover, the quantity of slime, loosely-bound EPS (LB-EPS), tightly-bound EPS (TB-EPS) of sludge around the membrane in the three reactors was also calculated to further investigate the effect of electric field on organic matter forming membrane fouling. Results indicated that levels of all the three EPS layers decreased following the application of anodic potential to the membrane-anode, with a significant reduction in the eRAnMBR (Fig. 5a and Supplementary Fig. 15). Two-Dimensional correlation spectroscopy (2D-COS) analysis were generated using LB-EPS and SMP infrared spectra (Fig. 5c–h) to further gain insights into the molecular compositions of organic substances. During the transformation from LB-EPS to SMP, signal changes in the asynchronous spectra revealed that the sequence of electron disturbance in the control group was polysaccharide (1150 cm−1) > amide I (1640 cm−1) > amide II (1540 cm−1). In contrast, for the electro-AnMBR groups, the sequence of electron disturbance was amide II (1540 cm−1) > amide I (1640 cm−1) > polysaccharide (1150 cm−1). The intricate structure, diverse functional groups, and uneven surface charge made proteins more easily influenced by the electric field than polysaccharides39,44. Additionally, redox proteins, as the main electroactive components in EPS, played a crucial role in the extracellular electron transfer process45. These made proteins more likely to participate in redox reactions after the electric field applied, thereby accelerating the electron transport rate.

a Proteins and polysaccharides concentration of slime layer, LB-EPS layer, and TB-EPS layer of sludge around the membrane in the three reactors during the stable period. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the EPS concentration results, which were measured after being extracted three times from the sludge of each reactor. b Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of sludge EPS in the three reactors during the stable period. (Here, EPS referred to the overall EPS obtained using a one-step extraction method, without layered extraction, including both LB-EPS and TB-EPS). The gray blocks were used to highlight the peaks in the figure, with the corresponding wavelengths of each peak written below the gray blocks, and the functional groups corresponding to each peak were explained in detail in the Supplementary Note 1. Synchronous spectra (c, e, g) and asynchronous spectra (d, f, h) of 2D-COS analysis using LB-EPS and SMP infrared spectra of sludge around the membrane in the three reactors, with (c) and (d) showing the AnMBR, (e) and (f) showing the eAnMBR, and (g) and (h) showing the eRAnMBR. Red and blue represent positive and negative correlations, respectively. Relevance increases with increasing color intensity. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

The analysis of archaeal community also explained the mechanism behind enhanced CH4 production of the eRAnMBR. From Fig. 6b we can see that Methanobacterium was the dominant archaea genus in the control AnMBR, with a relative abundance of 92.9%. In contrast, following the application of an electric field, the relative abundance of Methanosarcina increased to 5.6% in the eAnMBR and 43.9% in the eRAnMBR. The abundance of Methanosarcina increased in the eAnMBR was favorable for CH4 production46, due to its capability to produce CH4 through all the three methanogenesis pathways (acetoclastic, hydrogenotrophic, and methylotrophic methanogenesis)22,47. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 16, all relative abundances of modules involved in methanogenesis increased in the eRAnMBR. Besides, Methanosaeta and Methanosarcina, the only methanogen genera with membrane-bound cytochromes48, may facilitate extracellular electron exchange and DIET process49. The abundance of DMER64 genus possessing DIET ability and the cytochrome c-type coding genes related to DIET also increased (Fig. 6c and Supplementary Table 2). And the apparent electron transfer rate constant (kapp) of the eRAnMBR was higher than the other two reactors (Supplementary Fig. 17), indicating that the overall extracellular electron transfer performance was strengthened50. DIET, considered to be a more efficient electron transfer pathway51 without relying on the diffusion of electron carriers such as H2, was conducive to the increase of CH4 yield in the eRAnMBR. In addition, Methanosarcina produced less EPS than Methanobacterium52 which can help alleviating membrane fouling.

a Differences of Methanobacterium and Methanosarcina on EPS secretion and electron transport. Methanobacterium was the only dominant archaea in the AnMBR and eAnMBR, while Methanosarcina was also the dominant archaea in the eRAnMBR. b Relative abundance of archaea at genus level in the AnMBR, eAnMBR, and eRAnMBR. c Relative abundance of bacteria at genus level in the AnMBR and eAnMBR. The anodes of the eAnMBR comprised a conductive membrane and a graphite plate, while the anodes of the eRAnMBR included a conductive membrane and a Mg plate. Applied voltage of both the eRAnMBR and eAnMBR was 0.6 V. (Note: the word electro-AnMBR means we mention both the eRAnMBR and eAnMBR). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

To strengthen energy and resource recovery as well as membrane anti-fouling, a eRAnMBR featuring dual anodes—an Mg anode and a membrane-anode—was developed. Notably, the eRAnMBR system outperformed traditional AnMBRs, removing 30.59% of NH4+-N and 99% of PO43−-P, while producing struvite with 60.64% purity and depositing 0.08 g d−1 on the cathode surface for easy separation from the sludge. The eRAnMBR system also upgraded biogas to biomethane, significantly increasing its calorific value and facilitating its recovery as natural gas. The operating cost analysis indicated that the average energy production capacity of the eRAnMBR, exceeded the additional energy and electrode material consumption, demonstrating the economic viability of this configuration (Supplementary Note 3). The enhancement of DIET and all methanogenesis pathways within the system, along with the H2 evolution and alkalinity production after the application of the Mg anode, all contributed to the increase in CH4 purity and yield. In-depth research on the physicochemical properties of the sludge explained the 95% reduction in membrane fouling of the eRAnMBR. The released Mg2+ increased floc size, decreased the adhesion force between the sludge particles and the membrane surface, and reduced the proportion of hydrogen bonds in the secondary structure of EPS proteins, thereby weakening the formation of the gel layer and making the cake layer structure loose and porous. The application of the electric field also enhanced the microbial anodic oxidation, and made proteins more likely to participate in redox reactions.

In this study, it was found that alleviating membrane fouling by regulating the cake layer through altering the physicochemical properties of the sludge was far more effective than the singular electrodynamic effect. This provided a new approach for extending membrane lifespan in future applications. The new configuration, which switched between the membrane and Mg anodes, reduced Mg material input while effectively recovering three types of resources, enabling the application of AnMBRs in a more sustainable wastewater treatment. As for industrial applications, more economical anode materials, electrode configurations that highly facilitate mass transfer and struvite precipitation, and more efficient utilization of the generated CH4 to reduce costs are engineering considerations for the practical application of this reactor.

In this study, three integrated AnMBRs, eRAnMBR, eAnMBR, and a conventional AnMBR, were operated in parallel. Each bioreactor system consisted of a continuously stirred cylindrical anaerobic digester with an effective volume of 5.0 L (190 mm internal diameter, 240 mm height), into which the membrane unit was directly immersed. A removable module was designed at the center of the reactor’s top lid, where the electrode plates and membrane modules were fixed. This setup allowed for quick replacement of the membrane modules and electrode plates without disrupting the anaerobic environment (Supplementary Fig. 1). The three setups were operated under different conditions.In the eRAnMBR, a conductive Ti membrane (141.4 cm2 surface area and 0.22 μm pore size, purity >99.6%) was used as one of the anodes, while a Mg plate (100 mm × 60 mm × 3.5 mm, 99.9%, 1.74 g cm−3) and a graphite plate (100 mm × 60 mm × 3.5 mm, 99.9%, 1.8 g cm−3) acted as the second anode and the cathode, respectively. In the eAnMBR and conventional AnMBR systems, the Mg plate was replaced with a graphite anode. Copper wiring was used to connect the electrodes in both the eRAnMBR and eAnMBR to a 0.6 V DC power source, with the anodes operating at an optimized ratio of 1:60 for Mg and the Ti membrane in the eRAnMBR (the same ratio for graphite and Ti membrane in the eAnMBR). In contrast, the conventional AnMBR operated with an open circuit, serving as the control group. To maintain homogeneity of the mixed liquor, a magnetic stirrer was used in all reactors, and the liquid levels were kept constant via a float valve system connected to a balance tank. Biogas production was measured by periodically replacing the gas collection bags positioned atop the reactors. Membrane fouling was monitored by tracking the evolution of TMP under constant flux conditions. When the TMP reached a threshold of 80 kPa, the membrane module was replaced, and a new operational phase commenced. In addition, pH and oxidation-reduction potential sensors were installed within the reactors for continuous monitoring, ensuring the system remained stable. All reactors were operated at a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 8 days, with the temperature controlled at 38 ± 1 °C using a thermostatic water bath.

The AnMBR was fed with highly concentrated organic wastewater, rich in nitrogen and phosphorus, simulated using glucose (99%, SCR), CH3COONa (99%, SCR), KH2PO4 (99.5%, SCR), NH4Cl (99.8%, SCR), and tryptone (BR, SCR) as sources of carbon, phosphorus, and nitrogen. The COD, NH4+-N, and PO43−-P levels in raw water were approximately 6.0 ± 0.25 g L−1, 300 mg L−1, and 160 mg L−1, respectively. Trace element formulae referred to previous research and detailed compositions are shown below: MgSO4 (99%, SCR) 3.0 g L−1; MnSO4·H2O (99%, SCR) 0.5 g L−1; NaCl (99.8%, SCR) 1.0 g L−1; FeSO4·7H2O (99%, SCR) 0.1 g L−1; CaCl2·2H2O (96%, SCR) 0.1 g L−1; CoCl2·H2O (99%, SCR) 0.1 g L−1; ZnCl2 (98%, Macklin) 0.13 g L−1; CuSO4·5H2O (99%, SCR) 0.01 g L−1; AlK(SO4)2·12H2O (99.8%, SCR) 0.01 g L−1; H3BO3 (99.5%, Innochem) 0.01 g L−1; Na2MoO4 (99%, SCR) 0.025 g L−1; NiCl2·6H2O (98%, SCR) 0.024 g L−1; Na2WO4·2H2O (99%, SCR) 0.025 g L−1. The inoculated activated sludge in the reactor was obtained from the sludge digestion tank of the Gaobeidian Wastewater Treatment Plant (Beijing, China). Initial anaerobic sludge was added into the reactors through a 1-mm mesh sieve after dilution so that the mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) and mixed liquor volatile suspended solids (MLVSS) in the reactor eventually reached 10,000 mg L−1 and 5000 mg L−1, respectively.

COD was measured using a HACH DR/3900 spectrophotometer (CO 80539; HACH, USA). The concentrations of NH4+-N and PO43−-P were measured using Nessler’s reagent and molybdate spectrophotometry (T6, PERSEE, China). The TMP was detected using a pressure sensor between the effluent and pump (Thunder Magnet, Shanghai Instrument Co., China) and recorded using a data acquisition device. A pH detector (HQ30d, Hach Co., USA) was used to determine pH.

EPS were extracted by thermal extraction (Supplementary Method 1)53. All extracted EPS samples were measured using a three-dimensional excitation emission matrix (EEM) (F-4600, HITACHI, Japan) and FTIR (Nicolet iN10MX, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Imported the infrared data the infrared spectra data of LB-EPS and SMP into the software 2D Shige ver. 1.3 (Shigeaki Morita, Kwansei-Gakuin University, Japan), and then obtained the 2D-COS spectra to gain insights into the molecular compositions and formation mechanisms of organic substances. The amide I region of the FTIR spectra at 1700–1600 cm−1 was then obtained using Omnic v8.0 (Thermo-Fisher Scientific Inc.) to explore protein secondary structures. The second-derivative and deconvolution spectra were obtained using Peakfit v4.12 (Seasolve Software Inc.). The amide I band was then fitted until the residual reached the minimum according to the maximum absorption intensity, band frequency, and bandwidth from the second-derivative spectra. Peakfit software was used for quantitative analysis of each peak54. The EPS concentration was measured, with protein content determined using the Folin-phenol method and polysaccharide content determined using the phenol-sulfuric acid method.

A laser particle size analyzer (Mastersizer2000, Malvern, UK) was used to measure particle size of the sludge. A Zetasizer Nano Z instrument (Malvern, UK) was used to determine the zeta potential of the sludge and a Viscosity meter (DV2TLV, Brookfield, USA) was used to determine sludge viscosity. The sludge from the AnMBRs was freeze-dried for 48 h using a vacuum freeze dryer (FD-IA-50, Biocool, China), then examined using XPS (ESCALAB250Xi, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and BET surface area analysis (ASAP 2460, Micromeritics, USA). AFM was employed to measure the interaction forces between metal surface and sludge flocs. A true color confocal microscope (Zeiss CSM700, Germany) was used to observe the surface morphology of the cake layer. CV curves of the membranes in the AnMBRs were constructed using a three-electrode system (CHI660, Chenhua Instrument, China), in which Ag/AgCl (R0303, 6 mm × 65 mm) served as the reference electrode, membrane served as the working electrode, and graphite cathode served as the opposing electrode with the range of 0.8 V to −0.8 V and scan rates of 2 mV s−1 (electrode parameters were shown in AnMBR construction and operation). CLSM (Fluoview FV-1000, Olympus, Germany) was employed to visualize the distribution of nucleic acids, proteins, and polysaccharides on the sludge cake layers.

At the end of each operational cycle, the electrode plate of the eRAnMBR was replaced, and the precipitate accumulated on the surface of the graphite cathode was scraped off. The precipitate was then imaged and analyzed using SEM (Nova Nano SEM 450, FEI, USA) in conjunction with XRD (X’Pert3 Powder, PANalytical, Netherlands). Given that most common impurities formed during struvite crystallization, such as Mg(OH)2, MgHPO4, Mg3(PO4)2, and MgKPO455, do not contain nitrogen, we assumed that one mole of ammonium corresponded to one mole of struvite56 for purity calculations. The struvite purity was determined using Eq. (1):

where (NH4+-N)prec is the measured concentration of the ammonium nitrogen in the precipitate and (NH4+-N)struv is the theoretical content of nitrogen in pure struvite (57 mg g−1). To quantify the struvite purity, 0.1 g of precipitate from the plate was dissolved in 0.5% nitric acid solution, and the total volume was brought up to 50 mL using ultrapure water. The ammonium concentration was then measured using Nessler’s Reagent Spectrophotometry. Based on the measured ammonium content, the mass of struvite in the precipitate was calculated, and the struvite purity was obtained by dividing this value by the initial 0.1 g sample57.

The sludge of the AnMBRs was collected at the end of the experiment and cryopreserved at −80 °C. The bacterial and archaeal communities were analyzed using 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing, with an E.N.Z.A.® soil DNA kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, America) used to extract DNA from sludge samples before sequencing. According to the instructions of the kit, the basic extraction steps included the cracking of microbial cells, removal of impurities such as proteins, and DNA precipitation and purification. The DNA integrity of the samples was then examined by agarose gel. High-throughput sequencing of the extracted DNA was conducted using the Majorbio sequencing platform (Shanghai, China). The hypervariable region V3-V4 of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene were amplified with primer pairs 338F (5’-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3’) and 806R (5’-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3’)58. The hypervariable region V4-V5 of the archaeal 16S rRNA gene was amplified with primer pairs 524F10extF (5’-TGYCAGCCGCCGCGGTAA-3’) and Arch958RmodR (5’- YCCGGCGTTGAVTCCAATT-3’)52. The amplifications were carried out using T100 Thermal Cycler PCR thermocycler (BIO-RAD, USA). Illumina Miseq-PE300 sequencing service was provided by Majorbio (Shanghai, China).

The cake layers of the membranes in the AnMBR and the eAnMBR and anaerobic sludge samples of bulk solution in the three groups were collected for metagenomic analysis from the perspective of microbes and genes. Analysis included DNA extraction, library construction, metagenomic sequencing, sequence quality control, genome assembly, gene prediction, taxonomic annotation, and alignment of functional protein coding genes. BLASTP v2.2.28+ (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) was used to compare non-redundant gene sequences with the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database, with the expected value of BLAST comparison parameters set to 1e−5. Based on the comparative results, functional annotation was conducted using KOBAS 2.0 [4] (KEGG Orthology Based Annotation System). The abundance of genes corresponding to KO, Pathway, EC, and Module was summed to calculate the abundance of this functional category.

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

The data supporting the findings of this work are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files. Source data are provided with this paper. The number PRJNA1164645 gives access to raw data deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive database. Source data are provided with this paper.

Meng, F. G. et al. Fouling in membrane bioreactors: An updated review. Water Res. 114, 151–180 (2017).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Pervez, M. N. et al. A critical review on nanomaterials membrane bioreactor (NMs-MBR) for wastewater treatment. Npj Clean. Water 3, 43 (2020).

CAS Google Scholar

Lim, K., Evans, P. J. & Parameswaran, P. Long-Term Performance of a Pilot-Scale Gas-Sparged Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor under Ambient Temperatures for Holistic Wastewater Treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 7347–7354 (2019).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Cheng, D. L. et al. Anaerobic membrane bioreactors for antibiotic wastewater treatment: Performance and membrane fouling issues. Bioresour. Technol. 267, 714–724 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Wang, R. et al. Electrochemical ammonia recovery and co-production of chemicals from manure wastewater. Nat. Sustain. 7, 179–190 (2024).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Li, W. W., Yu, H. Q. & Rittmann, B. E. Chemistry: Reuse water pollutants. Nature 528, 29–31 (2015).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Lu, L. et al. Wastewater treatment for carbon capture and utilization. Nat. Sustain. 1, 750–758 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Bogdanov, D. et al. Radical transformation pathway towards sustainable electricity via evolutionary steps. Nat. Commun. 10, 1077 (2019).

Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Hu, Z. T. et al. Integrated urban water management by coupling iron salt production and application with biogas upgrading. Nat. Commun. 14, 6405 (2023).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Zhen, G. Y. et al. Anaerobic membrane bioreactor towards biowaste biorefinery and chemical energy harvest: Recent progress, membrane fouling and future perspectives. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 115, 109392 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Jiang, B. et al. Impacts of long-term electric field applied on the membrane fouling mitigation and shifts of microbial communities in EMBR for treating phenol wastewater. Sci. Total Environ. 716, 137139 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Hu, D. X. et al. Improvement of sludge characteristics and mitigation of membrane fouling in the treatment of pesticide wastewater by electrochemical anaerobic membrane bioreactor. Water Res. 213, 118153 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Zhao, K. et al. Antifouling potential and microbial characterization of an electrochemical anaerobic membrane bioreactor utilizing membrane cathode and iron anode. Bioresour. Technol. 334, 125230 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Kekedy-Nagy, L. et al. Electrochemical nutrient removal from natural wastewater sources and its impact on water quality. Water Res. 210, 118001 (2022).

Almatouq, A. & Babatunde, A. O. Concurrent hydrogen production and phosphorus recovery in dual chamber microbial electrolysis cell. Bioresour. Technol. 237, 193–203 (2017).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Liu, Y. et al. Recent progress on the recovery of valuable resources from source-separated urine on-site using electrochemical technologies: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 442, 136200 (2022).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Liao, M. L., Liu, Y., Tian, E. L., Ma, W. Q. & Liu, H. Phosphorous removal and high-purity struvite recovery from hydrolyzed urine with spontaneous electricity production in Mg-air fuel cell. Chem. Eng. J. 391, 123517 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Tarpeh, W. A., Barazesh, J. M., Cath, T. Y. & Nelson, K. L. Electrochemical Stripping to Recover Nitrogen from Source-Separated Urine. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 1453–1460 (2018).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Andronikou, M., Adamou, V., Koutsokeras, L., Constantinides, G. & Vyrides, I. Magnesium ribbon and anaerobic granular sludge for conversion of CO2 to CH4 or biogas upgrading. Chem. Eng. J. 435, 134888 (2022).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Yuan, H. P. & Zhu, N. W. Progress in inhibition mechanisms and process control of intermediates and by-products in sewage sludge anaerobic digestion. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 58, 429–438 (2016).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Miltner, M., Makaruk, A. & Harasek, M. Review on available biogas upgrading technologies and innovations towards advanced solutions. J. Clean. Prod. 161, 1329–1337 (2017).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Chen, M. et al. Recent advances in electrochemical processes integrated with anaerobic membrane bioreactor in wastewater treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 468, 143822 (2023).

Sun, Q. et al. Selection of appropriate biogas upgrading technology-a review of biogas cleaning, upgrading and utilisation. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 51, 521–532 (2015).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Li, L., Xu, Y., Dai, X. H. & Dai, L. L. Principles and advancements in improving anaerobic digestion of organic waste via direct interspecies electron transfer. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 148, 111367 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Kékedy-Nagy, L., Teymouri, A., Herring, A. M. & Greenlee, L. F. Electrochemical removal and recovery of phosphorus as struvite in an acidic environment using pure magnesium vs. the AZ31 magnesium alloy as the anode. Chem. Eng. J. 380, 122480 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Wang, Y. C. et al. Electrochemically mediated precipitation of phosphate minerals for phosphorus removal and recovery: Progress and perspective. Water Res. 209, 117891 (2022).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Shih, Y. J., Abarca, R. R. M., de Luna, M. D. G., Huang, Y. H. & Lu, M. C. Recovery of phosphorus from synthetic wastewaters by struvite crystallization in a fluidized-bed reactor: Effects of pH, phosphate concentration and coexisting ions. Chemosphere 173, 466–473 (2017).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Meng, F. G., Yang, F. L., Xiao, J. N., Zhang, H. M. & Gong, Z. A new insight into membrane fouling mechanism during membrane filtration of bulking and normal sludge suspension. J. Membr. Sci. 285, 159–165 (2006).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Boo, C., Hong, S. & Elimelech, M. Relating Organic Fouling in Membrane Distillation to Intermolecular Adhesion Forces and Interfacial Surface Energies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 14198–14207 (2018).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Ding, A. Q. et al. Impacts of applied voltage on microbial electrolysis cell-anaerobic membrane bioreactor (MEC-AnMBR) and its membrane fouling mitigation mechanism. Chem. Eng. J. 333, 630–635 (2018).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Li, B., Zhao, J. H., Ge, W. Q., Li, W. P. & Yuan, H. Y. Coagulation-flocculation performance and floc properties for microplastics removal by magnesium hydroxide and PAM. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 10, 107263 (2022).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Jia, F. X. et al. Stratification of Extracellular Polymeric Substances (EPS) for Aggregated Anammox Microorganisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 3260–3268 (2017).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Song, J. X. et al. Conditioning fecal sludge of public toilets with coupled zero-valent iron and persulfate: Efficiency and mechanism. J. Hazard. Mater. 455, 131615 (2023).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Fu, Q. Z. et al. Revealing an unrecognized role of free ammonia in sulfur transformation during sludge anaerobic treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 452, 131305 (2023).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Li, Y. F. et al. How does zero valent iron activating peroxydisulfate improve the dewatering of anaerobically digested sludge? Water Res. 163, 114912 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Fu, Q. Z. et al. Rhamnolipid increases H2S generation from waste activated sludge anaerobic fermentation: An overlooked concern. Water Res. 221, 118742 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Lei, Z. et al. New insight into the membrane fouling of anaerobic membrane bioreactors treating sewage: Physicochemical and biological characterization of cake and gel layers. J. Membr. Sci. 632, 119383 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Chen, Y. F. et al. Novel insights into membrane fouling caused by gel layer in a membrane bioreactor: Effects of hydrogen bonding. Bioresour. Technol. 276, 219–225 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Yu, Q. L. & Zhang, Y. B. Fouling-resistant biofilter of an anaerobic electrochemical membrane reactor. Nat. Commun. 10, 4860 (2019).

Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Sanders, C., Turkarslan, S., Lee, D. W. & Daldal, F. Cytochrome c biogenesis: the Ccm system. Trends Microbiol. 18, 266–274 (2010).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Prindle, A. et al. Ion channels enable electrical communication in bacterial communities. Nature 527, 59–63 (2015).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Ki, D., Popat, S. C., Rittmann, B. E. & Torres, C. I. H2O2 Production in Microbial Electrochemical Cells Fed with Primary Sludge. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 6139–6145 (2017).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Yu, Q. L., Jin, X. C. & Zhang, Y. B. Sequential pretreatment for cell disintegration of municipal sludge in a neutral Bio-electro-Fenton system. Water Res. 135, 44–56 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Hou, R. et al. Anode potential-dependent protection of electroactive biofilms against metal ion shock via regulating extracellular polymeric substances. Water Res. 178, 115845 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Yang, G. Q. et al. Anode potentials regulate Geobacter biofilms: New insights from the composition and spatial structure of extracellular polymeric substances. Water Res. 159, 294–301 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

McGlynn, S. E., Chadwick, G. L., Kempes, C. P. & Orphan, V. J. Single cell activity reveals direct electron transfer in methanotrophic consortia. Nature 526, 531–535 (2015).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Sierra, J. D. M., Oosterkamp, M. J., Wang, W., Spanjers, H. & van Lier, J. B. Comparative performance of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor and anaerobic membrane bioreactor treating phenolic wastewater: Overcoming high salinity. Chem. Eng. J. 366, 480–490 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Thauer, R. K., Kaster, A. K., Seedorf, H., Buckel, W. & Hedderich, R. Methanogenic archaea: ecologically relevant differences in energy conservation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 579–591 (2008).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Rotaru, A. E. et al. Direct Interspecies Electron Transfer between Geobacter metallireducens and Methanosarcina barkeri. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 4599–4605 (2014).

Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Li, H. et al. Zeolitic imidazolate framework-derived porous carbon enhances methanogenesis by facilitating interspecies electron transfer: Understanding fluorimetric and electrochemical responses of multi-layered extracellular polymeric substances. Sci. Total Environ. 781, 146447 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Zhao, Z. Q. et al. Communities stimulated with ethanol to perform direct interspecies electron transfer for syntrophic metabolism of propionate and butyrate. Water Res. 102, 475–484 (2016).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Deng, H. Q. et al. Membrane fouling mitigation by coagulation and electrostatic repulsion using an electro-AnMBR in kitchen wastewater treatment. Water Res. 222, 118883 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Dominguez, L., Rodriguez, M. & Prats, D. Effect of different extraction methods on bound EPS from MBR sludges. Part I: Influence of extraction methods over three-dimensional EEM fluorescence spectroscopy fingerprint. Desalination 261, 19–26 (2010).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Hou, X., Liu, S. & Zhang, Z. Role of extracellular polymeric substance in determining the high aggregation ability of anammox sludge. Water Res. 75, 51–62 (2015).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Kruk, D. J., Elektorowicz, M. & Oleszkiewicz, J. A. Struvite precipitation and phosphorus removal using magnesium sacrificial anode. Chemosphere 101, 28–33 (2014).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Ye, X. et al. Dissolving the high-cost with acidity: A happy encounter between fluidized struvite crystallization and wastewater from activated carbon manufacture. Water Res. 188, 116521 (2021).

Zhang, Y., Gu, K., Zhao, K., Deng, H., & Hu, C., Enhancement of struvite generation and anti-fouling in an electro-AnMBR with Mg anode-MF membrane module. Water Res. 230, 119561 (2023).

Deng, Y., Xia, J., Zhao, R., Liu, X. & Xu, J. Modified biochar promotes the direct interspecies electron transfer between iron-reducing bacteria and methanogens in high organic loading co-digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 342, 126030 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

This work was financially supported by the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China (No. 52125003 received by C.H.), Projects of International Cooperation and Exchanges of the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52261145702 received by C.H.), and the Basic Science Center Project of the Natural Science Foundation of China (No.52388101 received by C.H.).

State Key Laboratory of Environmental Aquatic Chemistry, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100085, Beijing, China

Yuhan Zhang, Yongbin Wang, Zhibin Chen, Chengzhi Hu & Jiuhui Qu

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049, Beijing, China

Yuhan Zhang, Zhibin Chen, Chengzhi Hu & Jiuhui Qu

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

C.H., J.Q. and Y.Z. designed the experiments; Y.Z. performed the research; Y.Z., Y.W. and Z.C. analyzed the data; Y.Z. and C.H. wrote the paper; C.H., J.Q. and Y.Z. discussed the results.

Correspondence to Chengzhi Hu.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Nature Communications thanks Guangyin Zhen and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, Z. et al. Recovering nutrients and unblocking the cake layer of an electrochemical anaerobic membrane bioreactor. Nat Commun 15, 9111 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53341-y

Download citation

Received: 15 May 2024

Accepted: 10 October 2024

Published: 22 October 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53341-y

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative