Best Backpacking Water Filters of 2023

We pumped hundreds of liters of dirty water to find the fastest and most reliable filter

No backflushing required to maintain a fast flow.

Fast filtration and effective against viruses.

Large and quick enough for big camping groups.

We may earn revenue from the products available on this page and participate in affiliate programs. Learn More ›

Imagine this: you’re in the backcountry, nearly out of liquids on a scorcher of a day, when you hit the first water source you’ve seen for hours. You sit down, pull out your bladder and your pump, and drop the intake tube into the water. But when you go to pump, the pressure goes slack. Or the nozzle jams, barely a drop coming out no matter how much you squeeze. Chances are, if you’ve spent enough time in the backcountry, you don't have to imagine this scenario: It's happened to you. Maybe more than once.

It's certainly happened to me. So for Outdoor Life's test of the best backpacking water filters, we decided to see which models from the top brands—including MSR, Lifestraw, Katadyn, Grayl, Platypus, and RapidPure—could handle the gnarliest water conditions backpackers can expect to find: stagnant water with high levels of bacterial contamination, the dark-tea tannin-filled water of a wetland, and silt-filled glacial runoff.

Before I even began testing, I interviewed the folks at MSR, LifeStraw, and Katadyn about how they guarantee that their filters are indeed removing bacteria and protozoa (and in the case of a few of them, viruses). All of them engage in rigorous testing, using EPA or NSF standards, both in their own facilities and through third parties, like BCS Laboratories out of Florida. I visited the MSR facility where they showed me the lab where they not only grow E. coli bacteria, but also a virus that attacks E. coli, to test the performance of their Guardian filter. The thoroughness of this testing is not something that can be easily replicated in the natural environment, where the pre-existing levels of bacteria, protozoa, and viruses are unknown. As such, my testing did not look at how well the filters dealt with bacteria, protozoa, and viruses, because all the filters in this review use EPA or NSF standards.

Something else that you’ll often see on the packaging of backpacking water filters is the number of liters per minute that they filter. This number, however, only reflects what the filter is capable of doing right out of the box—not after you’ve taken it out on a couple of backpacking trips—or 20. The brands of course are testing to ensure that the filters can withstand a certain level of grit, but it's rare to learn what the flow rate of the filters is after they’ve been exposed to some less-than-ideal water sources, let alone how much grit and sediment and muck a filter can take before it craps out completely. So my testing looked at what conditions can the backpacking filters withstand and still return a reasonable (or any) flow rate.

To start, I called in or purchased the most popular backpacking water filters available, along with corresponding models from their competitors. Before I began testing the filters out in the field, I first timed how long it took each to filter one liter of water. Generally, these times corresponded to the advertised times of the manufacturers. During this process, I also noted how complicated the filter setup was out of the box.

Then I took the filters to was a public beach in Bellevue, Washington, which had been closed due to high levels of fecal matter (three times more than what's considered safe for swimming). Here I filter five liters of water through each of the filters in my test.

In addition to the recorded high levels of fecal contamination, the water was also fairly scummy.

At the end of the first round of testing, I took the filters back home and measured how long it took to run a liter of water through each, and how that compared to the out-of-the box test. In most cases, there was a noticeable, if not significant effect on the length of time it took to filter one liter of water. Ironically, some filters measured faster at the end of the initial round of testing than they had at the start; my impression is that this is the result of my becoming more efficient at using the filter with practice.

The second round of testing took place at Narbeck Wetland Sanctuary, just north of Seattle, Washington. This is a classically beautiful swamp, with plenty of water but all of it gunked up by the dirt and tannins and life teeming beneath the surface. Here we would see how well the backpacking water filters responded to the mucky water sources that those in the backcountry are sometimes forced to resort to. I filtered three liters through each of the water filters at this site, and then headed home to record how long it was taking each water filter to push water through.

Unsurprisingly, some of the filters were really struggling at the end of this test. For the filters that took over two minutes to process a liter of water, I followed manufacturer directions to backflush (pushing water backwards through the filter) or otherwise clean the filter, noting that some filters could not be cleaned or backflushed.

Then I retested those filters (the results are noted in a parenthetical in the below table) to see how effective cleaning the filters was at establishing water flow. The two filters that took over five minutes to process a liter of water at the end of the second round of testing, the LifeStraw Peak Series Gravity and the RapidPure Purifier+, were removed from the test at that time.

The final testing site was the Puyallup River, accessed at the town of Orting, Washington. At first glance, the Puyallup looks like any other muddy river. But the Puyallup gets its color from glacial sediment, an extremely fine silt that stays suspended in the water long after you’ve pulled a couple of liters out of the fast-moving water and which works its way into the inner workings of filtration systems like nobody's business. No one would choose to filter this kind of water unless there was no other option available; sometimes, there is no other option available.

Unsurprisingly, many of the filters struggled with cleaning three liters of water during this test, and one (the MSR Miniworks EX) was removed from testing as it simply clogged up and stopped working. At the end of this round of testing, the filters were measured to see what their flow rate was. Next, the filters, where possible, were also backflushed, or otherwise cleaned, and then had their flow rate measured again. (Note that some of the times for this stage were again faster than the initial flow. While I made an effort to standardize the amount of elbow grease I was putting into each filter during the timed test, it's clear that I was putting more elbow grease into the final stage of testing than I did straight out of the box). The final step of this test was to reweigh each of the filters to assess how their weight had changed from the start of testing. I pumped out as much water as I could from each filter and then placed the filters in an enclosed room with a dehumidifier to remove excess water (without drying out the filter components themselves). After an hour, I took them out and reweighed them.

Platypus

SEE IT

Why It Made the Cut

The Platypus QuickDraw, which had the second-fastest flow out of the box, won the top spot during the timed test after backflushing.

Key Features

Pros

Cons

Product Description

While the Platypus QuickDraw was a hair behind the Katadyn BeFree after the initial round of testing, it was out in front of the pack at the end of testing. The only round where the QuickDraw struggled was in the mucky water of the wetland, although I didn't backflush it until after the glacial runoff round as its flow was still ahead of the majority of filters. Once backflushed, its performance was restored to close to the level that it had out of the box.

Unlike the Sawyer Squeeze, you can backflush the Platypus QuickDraw with a SmartWater bottle. While I appreciated that I didn't need a separate tool to backflush the Platypus QuickDraw (something I’m prone to losing), I did find that the cap to the filter prevented me from creating a flush seal with the clean side of the filter. That being said, the Platypus QuickDraw cap was much more durable than either the Sawyer Squeeze's (broken by the end of testing) or the Katadyn BeFree's (getting there). While you can continue to filter water just fine without a cap, having it will help to increase the lifespan of your filter. I also found that the soft pliable material of platypus dirty sack combined with the positioning of the filter element on the interior (rather than on the inside of the bag), made this the most pleasant filter to squeeze water out of in my test.

Katadyn

SEE IT

Why It Made the Cut

This was the easiest filter to clean in my test as well as the second lightest and fourth fastest.

Key Features

Pros

Cons

Product Description

When it came time to clean the filters after three rounds of testing, I spent a lot of time on YouTube, learning how to clean ceramic filters and backflush with a SmartWater bottle. But when it was time to clean the BeFree, the instructions were almost comically simple. Just take it out of the bag, place it in a clean bowl of water, and swish it around a little. To be honest, I was doubtful this was going to do much, but I knew from conversations with the folks at Katadyn that backflushing this filter was not an option, as it may damage the hollow fibers and impair their ability to weed out protozoa and bacteria.

To my surprise, the swishing appeared to work. The bowl of water quickly became a murky brown. I repeated the process a couple of times and retested: the flow rate had improved by almost 20 percent. Not bad.

The Katadyn BeFree was the second lightest filter I tested, weighing a mere .2 ounces more than the Sawyer Mini despite coming with a larger dirty water sack—if you paired the Sawyer Mini with a SmartWater bottle instead of the provided dirty water sack, this would be the lighter of the two. For UL purists looking to update their Sawyer Squeeze, this should definitely be in contention.

There were a couple of things that I wish were different about the Katadyn BeFree. First off, the filter is housed inside of the dirty water bag, which makes it difficult to squeeze all of the water out—most of the time, this won't be a big deal, but if you’re sitting at a seep in the Southwest, where the water is coming out at a trickly liter every 10 minutes, it could start to get old. The other is the design of the lid cap, which basically resembles what you would see on a sports drink at the convenience store. When I lightly twisted it to test the durability it started to snap off. Of course, I can still use the filter as long as I hold onto the cap, but I would rather see a more durable cap in exchange for a few extra grams.

Sawyer

SEE IT

Why It Made the Cut

The Sawyer Squeeze had the second-fastest time at the end of the backpacking water filter test while costing less than its main rivals the Platypus Quickdraw and the Kataydn BeFree.

Key Features

Pros

Cons

Product Description

The Sawyer Squeeze has been a backpacking mainstay for decades and testing showed that hikers’ loyalty is well-founded. While this filter was slower than both the Platypus Quickdraw and the Katadyn BeFree during the first round of testing (by about 15 seconds and 25 seconds respectively), it was out ahead of the BeFree by the end of testing, and only 5 second behind the QuickDraw. While my testing showed that the Sawyer Squeeze was faster at the end of testing than it was at the start, I suspect that I had simply gotten used to putting in an excessive amount of elbow grease into the filters after pushing over 40 liters of glacial runoff through 14 filters.

Part of what makes this filter so effective is its backflushing system, which involves filling a simple syringe with water and then pushing its contents into the outflow nozzle on the filter. After running the filters through three liters each of the Puyallup River, I wasn't surprised to see the water shoot out brown initially, but it cleared up after only a couple of rounds of backflushing.

Unfortunately, the Sawyer Squeeze picked up two ounces of weight between the start and end of testing, suggesting that it's holding onto more moisture (and potentially unbackflushed grit) inside the filter than other comparative models.

Sawyer

SEE IT

Why It Made the Cut

While this filter was middle of the pack at the end of testing, it was both the lightest and the least expensive.

Key Features

Pros

Cons

Product Description

The mini-me version of the Sawyer Squeeze is the perfect filter for UL enthusiasts—small enough that it won't take up much real estate in your backpacking backpack and light enough (even after the final weigh-in) that you can scrub an ounce or more off your spreadsheet. Even better, it's so affordable that it wouldn't hurt your budget much to just replace it each season. Where it wobbles, unsurprisingly, is in water flow taking about twice as long as the standard Sawyer Squeeze to filter a liter of water. Of course, if you plan to attach the filter directly to a SmartWater bottle and suck the water out from there, that might not matter much to you.

I used the provided dirty bag during testing and was impressed with its durability. Even after squeezing the bag as hard as I could to push the water out over ten rounds of filling and filtering to reach the desired five liters, the bag still looked like new. I only wish that it was larger—the bag that comes with the mini is 16 ounces rather than the standard liter. Something else I noticed during testing was that the filter itself did not appear to screw onto the bag correctly. Each time I tried to fix it, the angle would still be lopsided. Fortunately, there were no leaks during testing so this appears to be mainly an aesthetic concern.

While the flow rate for the Sawyer Mini was not especially impressive (about four times as long as the Katadyn BeFree), I did appreciate that it came with a lightweight syringe to backflush the filter when it starts to clog too much.

Katadyn

SEE IT

Key Features

Why It Made the Cut

After the first stage of testing, the lightweight Katadyn BeFree Water Filtration System had the fastest flow of any in my test, while the Katadyn BeFree Gravity had the fastest flow of the gravity filters.

Pros

Cons

Product Description

At its core, all a water filtration system needs to do is move dirty water through a filter, without inadvertently contaminating the clean water vessel on the other side. One of the most popular styles of backpacking water filters leans into this simplicity: all a user has to do is fill up a plastic bag with dirty water, attach the filter, and then squeeze the water through into their drinking vessel.

The idea behind a gravity filter is fairly straightforward, instead of squeezing or pumping dirty water into your drinking vessel, let gravity do the work for you. After filling up the dirty bag—which holds up to three liters in the case of Katadyn—you then elevate it by placing it on a large rock, hanging it in a tree, or even holding it yourself, whatever works. The higher the water is, the faster it will flow through the filter, but it will work as long as the bag itself is higher up than the end of the outlet hose. Then you can just walk away while gravity forces the water from the dirty water sources into your clean container.

Of the three gravity filters in my test, the Katadyn Gravity BeFree had the fastest flow both when initially unboxed and after the final stage of testing. It was also lighter than the other two models in my test by several ounces.

One small, but potentially significant, difference between the Katadyn BeFree and the Platypus GravityWorks and LifeStraw Peak Series Gravity is that the hang strap is not attached to the water flask when the gravity is first unboxed. This strap, however, should not be considered optional. The bail handle at the top of the water flask is not intended to be slung over a branch, and is too small for the branch size that you would need for the filter to be safely suspended.

Another difference between the Katadyn Gravity BeFree and the other two filters in my test is that it is not designed for backflushing (which could damage the fibers), but the filter can be cleaned by carefully swishing it in water. While the filter did appear cleaner after I swished it, oddly, the time it took to filter a liter of water increased by a minute (I reran this test to confirm the results).

Platypus

SEE IT

Why It Made the Cut

The 8-liter capacity of the Platypus GravityWorks makes this one of the best backpacking water filters for larger groups.

Key Features

Pros

Cons

Product Description

All the gravity filters in my test came with a flask of at least three liters, which is nice if you are traveling with multiple people, as it reduces the number of rounds of filling up your dirty flask that you need to do. The Platypus GravityWorks takes this a step further, with a dirty flask capacity of four liters. Even better, it comes with a second bladder to filter your clean water directly into it.

In testing, the GravityWorks took about twice as long to filter a liter of water after the first stage of testing as the Katadyn BeFree; however, it was nearly unable to process the glacial runoff, taking an hour to filter a liter of water after the third stage of testing. After using about six liters of water to backflush the GravityWorks, which is accomplished by simply raising the clean water reservoir above the dirty reservoir and allowing the water to flow backward, the flow improved significantly, but not to the level of the Katadyn BeFree Gravity.

MSR Gear

SEE IT

Why It Made the Cut

The MSR Guardian hardly seemed to notice what quality of water I was pumping through it, holding to a steady forty-five seconds for a liter of water throughout testing. Even better: it protects against viruses.

Key Features

Pros

Cons

Product Description

For backpacking water filters, protection against viruses, including norovirus and rotovirus, typically comes with a tradeoff—if you want a filter with a small enough pore size to weed those suckers out, you better be prepared to put in some serious elbow grease. But the MSR Guardian manages the hat trick, filtering out viruses at a fast flow rate with the same, or even less, elbow grease required as from other filters.

Part of this due to a unique feature to the MSR Guardian: instead of directing all of the water out through the bottom of the filter with each pump, a portion of the water is directed back through the filter—essentially backflushing the filter with each pump. During testing, this meant that the filter had the same performance during the last round of testing as it did during the first: forty-five seconds for a liter of water.

I was also impressed with how easy the MSR Guardian was to use straight out of the box: after it had been unmoored from its packaging, I simply unscrewed the cap on the bottom of the filter, plopped the intake filter into my pool of water and started filtering water. Besides the prefilter, which can be a bit difficult to position in the water source due to a 90-degree angle, the biggest downside to the Guardian is its cost, and its weight: it was about ten times as expensive as other comparatively fast filters (the Katadyn BeFree, Platypus QuickDraw, and Sawyer Squeeze) and five times as heavy. But if you’re looking for a no-brainer filter that can remove the full spectrum of bacteria, protozoa, and viruses from your water with basically no maintenance required, then this is the filter for you.

Laura Lancaster

SEE IT

Why It Made the Cut

The LifeStraw will filter out Giardia and E.coli and it's inexpensive enough to buy it in bulk.

Key Features

Pros

Cons

Product Description

In a best-case emergency scenario, your home still has running water, but your local reservoir has been impacted and water must now be treated before it can be consumed. (And we all know how boiling water is a drag under these conditions.) So my first test was to simply hand a glass of water and a LifeStraw to everyone in my family and see what they thought.

I tried it out first—I definitely needed a lot of suction to move the water through the filter, but it was easy enough to use. After a few sips—the LifeStraw was easier to use after each one—I handed it over to my husband to try. "It wasn't that bad," he said. "The Peak Series is easier to use."

Next up was the three year old. She was excited to help (she spends a lot of time these days "testing" blankets and pillows in makeshift piles in our living room), but after giving the LifeStraw a try for five seconds or so, she lifted her head and wailed, "I can't do it!" Turns out the LifeStraw isn't as family friendly as I had hoped. "I’m so thirsty!" she continued. Now, this wasn't a real emergency situation, so it was easy enough to just take the straw out and let her drink the water normally, but imagine if it had been?

Next, we took the two LifeStraws on a little field trip around the neighborhood. The first stop was a stream running out of a slopey wooded area near our home. Usually in the fall, there is a gurgling, fresh-smelling stream of water coursing down this slope, but on this particular day—after an unusual stretch of dry weather—there was barely a trickle. Worse, it smelled surprisingly anaerobic—a bit like a pile of compost had gone off.

"I’m not drinking out of that," said my husband flatly. Fair, but science is science so I was committed to at least taking a small sip to see if this was something I would be willing to do in an emergency situation.

It took more than a few tries at squatting down (those LifeStraw models in the ads are clearly more flexible than I am) to figure out how to get the straw into the water without toppling over, but I eventually got there. The water was…warm…but otherwise tasted OK. Honestly, I’m trying not to think too much about it.

Next was the lakeshore. This is an active lake, in all the best ways—summertime is full of boats and seaplanes and fishermen and swimmers. But it's also a mess, with the debris from wartime plane crashes still hanging out at the bottom and regular sewage overflows that get piped in when it rains too much. It's the kind of lake where you keep your mouth closed when you’re in it, and you always take a shower afterward.

It was significantly harder to drink out of the lake than the stream. The gentle waves made it challenging to get close to the water's edge while the rocky beach was difficult to find my footing in. In this scenario, I would much prefer to dip a reservoir directly into the water and then drink from that. But, like with the wooded stream, the water was fine, and I felt fine after drinking it.

Backpacking water filters can cost as little as $25 to as much as $400. Much of the difference in cost reflects the long-term durability of the filter, as well as their ability to handle more complex water quality problems, including viruses and heavy metals.

The question of whether you need a water filter or purifier for backpacking is, to an extent, about the level of risk you are willing to tolerate. In the high alpine of a national park, for instance your odds are low, while if you are sharing a water source with livestock in a national forest, the odds increase considerably. Because the consequences of contracting a waterborne illness like giardia or cryptosporidium can be so severe, and both the cost and weight of low-profile filters like the Sawyer Mini Squeeze, Platypus Quickdraw, and LifeStraw Peak Series is not a burden for most backpackers, I recommend always carrying one in your hiking backpack and treating all your water sources with it. If you are unsure as to whether you need a water purifier—which will also remove viruses like rotovirus and norovirus—contact the land manager where you plan to travel for more information about the waterborne contaminants typically found there.

Even today, it is fairly common to see a blanket recommendation to always boil your water when out in the backcountry. The reason for this is simple: most backpacking water filters do not remove viruses, whereas chemical treatment methods are not effective at neutralizing protozoa like giardia and cryptosporidium. Boiling water, on the other hand, does it all. The trouble with this recommendation is that boiling water is not only time consuming, but can also require you to bring in an excess of fuel or a backpacking stove if where you are traveling doesn't have options readily available. Even if you do plan to boil all your water, carrying a lightweight filter is an important backup to have in the event that your fuel sources run out.

Filter versus Purifier

The difference between a water purifier and a water filter comes down to its filter pore size. Traditional water filters have pore sizes, typically .2 microns or 200 nanometers, that are small enough to weed out bacteria and protozoa, but not the much smaller viruses, such as rotovirus (70 nanometers) or norovirus (38 nanometers). Individuals traveling to backcountry environments known to be infected with viruses should take extra caution that their filter will protect them, but it is not common for water sources to be contaminated with viruses.

Camp versus Trail

If you plan to put a ton of miles on your hiking shoes, then the lighter weight of a squeeze-bag style filter may be a higher priority for you. However, if you are only hiking a short distance to camp, then the convenience of a gravity filter or the lower-effort pump filters may be an easier choice.

Sediment and Debris

If you expect the water sources on your next backpacking trip to be unusually dirty—full of swirling sediment or plant matter—then it's best to choose a backpacking water filter with a prefilter. The prefilter helps to ensure that some of the muck in the water source doesn't make its way into the more delicate fibers of your filter, which can ultimately clog it and render it inoperable.

The best backpacking water filters produced by reputable brands like MSR, LifeStraw, Katadyn, Platypus, RapidPure, and Grayl provide excellent protection against waterborne diseases in the backcountry. Which filter is right for you will depend in large part on whether you prioritize cost, weight, or long-term durability. To help you make a final decision on an efficient individual backpacking filter, we put the Sawyer Squeeze, Katadyn BeFree, and Platypus QuickDraw head to head in a new testing environment: the desert. While there are increasing numbers of low-profile filters on the market that are capable of removing viruses from water sources, during testing these were so arduous to use after even the first round of testing that I would recommend backpackers pair a chlorine-based disinfectant or even a UV-based purifier like a SteriPen with a water filter instead.

Lancaster is Outdoor Life's gear staff writer where she focuses on in-depth testing of backpacking and camping gear, with a particular interest in lightweight and ultralight gear. She lives in the Pacific Northwest with her husband and daughter. Contact the author here.

MORE TO READ

RELATED

We put Vortex's new budget bino in a...

READ NOW

RELATED

Get a great night's sleep with one of...

RELATED

We review sharp and nimble hunting knives with...